
|
| |
JOHN DONNE |
| |

|
| 1 |
Criticism of John Donne has
traditionally been male territory. Of the eighteen studies
of the poet recommended by Stevie Davies in her bibliography,
all are by men. Donne boasted of 'the masculine persuasive
force' of his verse, and after his death he was commended
in Thomas Carew's 'Elegy' for his 'line of masculine expression'.
Among recent critics, John Carey celebrated Donne for his
triumphant masculinity in his influential book John
Donne: Life, Mind and Art. Stevie Davies marches
onto this field like an Amazon determined to put the cohorts
of Donne's male supporters to flight. She reminds the reader,
particularly the male reader, what it is like to be a woman
experiencing the aggressive thrust of Donne's poetry. From
place after place in the so-called love poems she picks
out examples of Donne's contempt for women, his cynical
exploitation of their bodies and disregard of their minds,
and his coarse delight in their weakness. He dehumanizes
the mistress-figures: 'She becomes an edible
commodity; usable goods which, when sampled, are rendered
worthless; game to be flushed out and killed; a mindless
piece of flesh without individuality, whose feelings are
expressly not to be taken into account'.
Davies draws attention to the frequency of unpleasant voyeurism
in the love poems, and to the vindictiveness with which
Donne's lovers treat their mistresses. She observes too
a certain uneasiness and insecurity behind all the bluster.
Passages of scabrous eroticism are paraded before the reader
along with the more repellent descriptions of female sexuality,
to remind us not only that there is a good deal of this
kind of writing in Donne's verse, but also that he evidently
enjoyed titillating with these near-obscenities. The early
'Elegies' contain more of these passages than the 'Songs
and Sonets', and Stevie Davies is inclined to regard the
'Elegies' as the 'foundation-stones for his mature poetry',
indicating that the dismissive attitudes towards women continued
into the later poetry, even though softened and sometimes
overlaid with a spurious affection. While never denying
the immense expressiveness and power of Donne's verse, she
forcefully insists on the distasteful character of so many
of the poems for a feminist reader of today. Her point of
view has to be acknowledged, and may well prove to be influential,
for it is probably true to say that the majority of serious
readers of Donne these days are women, given the fact that
women form the majority of students of English in our time.
Yet perhaps it is inevitable that the corrective view of
Donne offered here is too extreme. What is most obviously
missing is a recognition that along with the male agressiveness
comes the most compelling love poetry ever written in English,
in which a depth of emotion and intensity of passion are
registered with incomparable skill, and where the delicacies
of feeling as well as the subtleties of thought are rendered
in such a memorable way that they often seem more real than
our own experience. Stevie Davies gives the impression that
Donne's poetry is less an expression of love than a record
of rape; yet although an accumulation of selected passages
can convey that impression, that is not the effect produced
by a random reading in the 'Songs and Sonets'. At least,
not to a male reader. One would indeed like to know if feminist
criticism is producing a lasting alteration in the way female
readers respond to traditionally admired love poets. On
the evidence of current student essays, I would guess that
the old enthusiasm for Donne persists, and that intelligent
and sensitive readers are not alienated from the young Elizabethan
philanderer. It is, however, apparent that there is a greatly
heightened awareness of his predatory nature and of his
fantasies of power and domination over women's bodies. There
is also a much franker recognition that 'the right true
end of love' is sexual conquest (something, for example,
that Helen Gardner even in the 1960s would scarcely admit)
and that love poetry, no matter how delicately scented,
almost always conceals strategies of seduction.
The opening section of the book is devoted to Donne's life,
career and personality, all briskly addressed in the vigorous,
pungent and economical style that is characteristic of the
author's approach. We are in familiar territory here, but
the material is well delivered in ways that bear steadily
on the poetry and on the self-presentation of the poet in
his verse. His theatricality is given much prominence, with
the suggestion that he had as many selves as a Shakespearean
play has characters. Attempts to identify the 'real' John
Donne are about as futile as attempts to detect Shakespeare
behind the gallery of characters he created. There is also
a sense in which Donne was never so intensely himself as
when he was acting, whether he was playing the ingenious
lover or presenting himself as a dying man preaching his
own funeral sermon to his congregation at St. Paul's. To
dramatize his grief, or his hopes and fears, in poetry or
in the pulpit was not to falsify them: 'the theatrical production
of emotion was its sincerest expression'. We are reminded
of Donne's affinity to Montaigne, who was also aware that
he possessed a multiplicity of selves that seemed to take
shape in response to the varied and ambiguous nature of
experience. Davies perceptively relates this multiform personality
to Donne's fondness for puns: 'he lived in pun, as a natural
element. Two-faced, three-angled and self-multiplying ambiguity
of meaning was paradoxically the only place where he felt
safe. Double meaning was his sanctuary or fastness'. This
observation rings true, for in a world where new information
was always coming in, where religious 'truth' was always
being contested by churches and sects, and where forthright
statements of opinion could be dangerous, ambiguity could
indeed be protective.
Though the secular self might take many forms, and the existence
of a central self be debatable, there was no question about
the soul. That was one and indivisible, and constantly at
risk. Although the adventures of the soul might also be
theatrical and spectacular, they were in earnest. Wit might
give the impression that Donne's soul was a sportive spirit,
but terror of damnation allied to an uncertain hope of salvation
drove that soul distractedly around 'the world's imagined
corners', and through time from the Creation to the Last
Judgement, searching desperately for a sign of grace. In
connection with these vertiginous spiritual flights Stevie
Davies likes to invoke Baroque or Mannerist analogies, but
these links with contemporary pictorial or architectural
taste are not entirely convincing, for Donne seems to have
had little interest in the visual arts of his time, even
though he had travelled on the continent and seen Counter-Reformation
works of art. He lived in an almost entirely verbal world.
But such analogies are helpful in placing Donne in the aesthetic
context of his time, and carefully constructed verbal bridges
do manage to connect Donne's poetic practice to the illusionist
world of the Counter-Reformation arts: 'Mannerism's insistence
that reality is not as we normally see it; its commitment
to aberration and the pulling of the viewer's lazy eye along
vistas of extension; its relentless invitation to us to
admire and be amazed, are reflected in Donne's literary
pyrotechnics'.
There is much here about Donne's searching after power through
the exercise of his eloquence and in the assumed relationships
within the poems. John Carey made this a dominant theme
of his own book, but it is sounded again here with great
effect. 'Self empowering wit' is rightly seen as a feature
of Donne's careers as a lover and as a priest. He can adopt
commanding positions as a prince or potentate or as a saint
of love in the 'Songs and Sonets', and when he turned churchman
he exploited the sermon as an authoritarian medium to the
utmost. In one sermon, for example, he was able to throw
his congregation into confusion by announcing his conclusion
first, 'in case today turns out to be the Last Day and he
has no time to finish it'. Other sermons caused his listeners
to groan and weep and stagger with anxiety, a distress only
he could mend by his concluding consolations. Davies observes
that one of the most satisfying moments in his career must
have been when the King knelt in his presence, while he
remained standing to conduct the service. This must have
been a dream situation for Donne.
This is a short book, but it is highly readable and rewardingly
provocative. It does make one want to go back to the poetry
and check if the assertions made here, especially about
Donne's contempt for women, hold up when one rereads the
verse. My sense is that the articulate intelligence so evident
in the love poems, their assuredness, and the conviction
that the lover will never run out of arguments to persuade,
retaliate or seduce, will always make them compelling, whatever
reservations one may have about the taste or character of
their inventor. |
| |
In-Between: Essays &
Studies in Literary Criticism V, II, Sept. 1996
|
|

|
This entire presentation Copyright
©
Stevie Davies
|
|
|
|